Skip to content

Reproductive & sexual health

Leuprolide

A GnRH agonist whose depot injections switch off sex-hormone production — used in prostate cancer, endometriosis and central precocious puberty depending on the product.

L5Repeated human trialsApproved medicine (jurisdiction-specific) · FDA (US)Approved
How settled this rating is:
high confidence in the current evidence rating
Routes studied:
Intramuscular, Subcutaneous injection
Also known as:
leuprolide acetate, Lupron Depot, Lupron, Eligard
Last reviewed:
2026-08-23
Jump to section

Evidence passport

Leuprolide

A one-screen evidence identity for this compound. These fields describe research maturity, confidence and legal status. They are not a safety guarantee, efficacy percentage or recommendation.

Reviewed 2026-08-23
Evidence level
L5Repeated human trials
Confidence
High confidence in rating
Regulatory status
Approved medicine (jurisdiction-specific) · See jurisdiction details
Development status
Approved

Evidence strength

Human efficacy evidence85 of 100 evidence strength

Higher = more and better-quality human evidence. It does not mean the effect is bigger or that the compound works for you.

Human safety evidence80 of 100 evidence strength

Higher = more mature, better-documented human safety data. It does not mean the compound is safer than one with a lower number.

The 0-100 values rate the strength and maturity of evidence, not how effective or safe the compound is.

Evidence base
Includes human studies
Furthest established stage
Approved
Human research maturity
Established hormone-suppression medicine family
Source curation
Sources fully curated

Routes recorded

IMSC injection

Overview

Human efficacy evidence strength85 of 100 evidence strength

Higher = more and better-quality human evidence. It does not mean the effect is bigger or that the compound works for you.

Preclinical (animal / lab) evidence strength75 of 100 evidence strength

Higher = more animal, tissue or cell research. Preclinical results are a starting point, not proof of a human benefit.

Human safety evidence strength80 of 100 evidence strength

Higher = more mature, better-documented human safety data. It does not mean the compound is safer than one with a lower number.

How to read these scores

Every number here rates the evidence, not the compound. They are editorial 0-100 strength ratings, not percentages, and not a rating out of five stars.

  • Human efficacy evidence strength — Higher = more and better-quality human evidence. It does not mean the effect is bigger or that the compound works for you.
  • Preclinical evidence strength — Higher = more animal, tissue or cell research. Preclinical results are a starting point, not proof of a human benefit.
  • Human safety evidence strength — Higher = more mature, better-documented human safety data. It does not mean the compound is safer than one with a lower number. A score of 80 does not mean “80% safe”.
  • Evidence level (L0-L5) — the strongest type of study behind the compound, from anecdote (L0) to large replicated human trials (L5). It is a description of the study evidence, not a quality, safety or recommendation rating.
  • Confidence — how likely we think it is that this rating changes as new research lands. Low confidence means the picture is unsettled, not that the compound is bad.

None of these ratings is medical advice, a safety guarantee, or a recommendation to use anything. How we grade evidence.

How far human research has progressed: Established hormone-suppression medicine family

Routes & formulations

Studied / approved routes

IMSC injection

Depot products are given IM or SC depending on the specific product; formulations are not interchangeable and dosing intervals differ by product.

Route availability is not evidence of efficacy, and evidence from one route does not transfer to another. The Registry never provides dosing or sourcing information.

Peptide lifecycle

  1. Discovery

  2. Preclinical

  3. Phase I

  4. Phase II

  5. Phase III

  6. Approved

Approved

What it is

A synthetic super-agonist of the GnRH receptor: after a brief stimulation phase, continuous exposure desensitises the pituitary and shuts down LH/FSH-driven sex-hormone production.

What people claim

  • Suppresses testosterone in advanced prostate cancer
  • Suppresses oestrogen in endometriosis
  • Pauses central precocious puberty

What the evidence actually says

Decades of controlled trials and clinical use underpin its hormone-suppression indications. The initial flare of hormone release is a predictable pharmacological effect reflected in labelling.

Useful next reads based on this compound — not recommendations.

Human evidence

  • Randomised trials and a long clinical history across prostate cancer, endometriosis and central precocious puberty indications.

Preclinical evidence

  • GnRH-receptor pharmacology demonstrating desensitisation with continuous agonism.

Animal and cell findings are Level 1–2 evidence.

Mechanism and pathways

  • Continuous GnRH-receptor stimulation down-regulates pituitary gonadotroph signalling, collapsing LH/FSH output and gonadal hormone production.

Safety and unknowns

  • Labelled class effects include hot flushes, bone-density effects with long-term use and the initial hormone flare.
  • Cardiovascular and metabolic considerations are labelled for prostate-cancer use.

Cancer relevance

This section covers questions raised by how the compound works in the body, plus anything regulators and trial teams keep an eye on. It is not a statement that this compound causes cancer — for most compounds here, no human data exist in either direction.

No concern identified

Used deliberately as a treatment in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; no cancer-promotion signal within approved use.

Regulatory status

Regulatory decisions apply to specific jurisdictions, products, formulations and indications. An approval elsewhere is not automatically an approval in your country.

Named regulators: FDA (US)

Multiple FDA-approved depot products exist with different indications — advanced prostate cancer, endometriosis, preoperative management of uterine fibroids and central precocious puberty among them. Each formulation and dosing interval is approved for specific uses.

Evidence grade

L5Repeated human trialsHigh confidence in rating

Substantial, consistent controlled human evidence supporting a specified outcome, preferably independently replicated. Approval is reported separately.

What would change our rating?

  • Not applicable at this evidence tier.

References and sources

Source transparency

A provenance snapshot of this profile. Counts show what kinds of sources are cited, not how much scientific weight each source deserves.

Sources fully curated
Last editorial review
2026-08-23
Recently reviewed · 54 days ago
Linked curated sources
1
Sources still pending
0
External specialist reviews
0
None recorded for this profile
Regulatory / label: 1

Review provenance

Registry editorial review: Colin Jackson-White, creator and editor, who is not a doctor or clinician. External specialist review is credited only when a named reviewer has completed a review of this exact profile.

Literature-discovery and AI tools may help locate or challenge candidate evidence, but they are not counted as evidence sources here. Registry judgements are tied to the underlying papers, trial records, regulator documents and official study records.

Source hierarchy: regulatory documents and trial registries first, peer-reviewed work next, sponsor material flagged as non-independent. We never use supplier or clinic marketing as evidence, and where a verified source has not yet been curated we say so rather than inventing one.

Evidence change history

These entries record changes to our assessment of the published evidence — not changes to the compound itself.

No recorded changes yet. Baseline position set on 2026-08-23.