Skip to content

GLP-1s & incretins

Retatrutide

An investigational GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonist with positive pivotal Phase 3 results and no approval anywhere.

L4Good human trialsIn clinical trialsIn clinical development
How settled this rating is:
high confidence in the current evidence rating
Routes studied:
Subcutaneous injection
Also known as:
LY3437943, triple agonist
Last reviewed:
2026-09-30
Jump to section

Evidence passport

Retatrutide

A one-screen evidence identity for this compound. These fields describe research maturity, confidence and legal status. They are not a safety guarantee, efficacy percentage or recommendation.

Reviewed 2026-09-30
Evidence level
L4Good human trials
Confidence
High confidence in rating
Regulatory status
In clinical trials
Development status
In clinical development

Evidence strength

Human efficacy evidence82 of 100 evidence strength

Higher = more and better-quality human evidence. It does not mean the effect is bigger or that the compound works for you.

Human safety evidence45 of 100 evidence strength

Higher = more mature, better-documented human safety data. It does not mean the compound is safer than one with a lower number.

The 0-100 values rate the strength and maturity of evidence, not how effective or safe the compound is.

Evidence base
Includes human studies
Furthest established stage
Phase III
Human research maturity
Pivotal Phase 3 results reported (2026); investigational, not approved
Source curation
Sources fully curated

Routes recorded

SC injection

Evidence Diff

What changed since the previous recorded review?

Grade unchanged

Previous recorded review

L4

Latest recorded review

L4

Latest material update

Lilly reported that adults with obesity or overweight and type 2 diabetes lost up to a mean 49.6 lb (22.5 kg, 20.8%) and had HbA1c reductions of up to 1.6 percentage points at 80 weeks in TRIUMPH-2.

These are company-reported Phase 3 topline results announced on 15 September 2026, pending fuller scientific presentation and publication. Retatrutide remains investigational and unapproved, and another sponsor topline does not move its Level 4 rating. Reviewed 18 September 2026.

This comparison uses only recorded change-log fields. Historical confidence is not inferred when it was not explicitly stored. A grade change still requires human editorial review.

Overview

Human efficacy evidence strength82 of 100 evidence strength

Higher = more and better-quality human evidence. It does not mean the effect is bigger or that the compound works for you.

Preclinical (animal / lab) evidence strength82 of 100 evidence strength

Higher = more animal, tissue or cell research. Preclinical results are a starting point, not proof of a human benefit.

Human safety evidence strength45 of 100 evidence strength

Higher = more mature, better-documented human safety data. It does not mean the compound is safer than one with a lower number.

How to read these scores

Every number here rates the evidence, not the compound. They are editorial 0-100 strength ratings, not percentages, and not a rating out of five stars.

  • Human efficacy evidence strength — Higher = more and better-quality human evidence. It does not mean the effect is bigger or that the compound works for you.
  • Preclinical evidence strength — Higher = more animal, tissue or cell research. Preclinical results are a starting point, not proof of a human benefit.
  • Human safety evidence strength — Higher = more mature, better-documented human safety data. It does not mean the compound is safer than one with a lower number. A score of 80 does not mean “80% safe”.
  • Evidence level (L0-L5) — the strongest type of study behind the compound, from anecdote (L0) to large replicated human trials (L5). It is a description of the study evidence, not a quality, safety or recommendation rating.
  • Confidence — how likely we think it is that this rating changes as new research lands. Low confidence means the picture is unsettled, not that the compound is bad.

None of these ratings is medical advice, a safety guarantee, or a recommendation to use anything. How we grade evidence.

How far human research has progressed: Pivotal Phase 3 results reported (2026); investigational, not approved

Routes & formulations

Studied / approved routes

SC injection

Clinical trials use once-weekly subcutaneous injection. Material sold online as 'retatrutide' is unapproved, unstudied in humans as sold, and outside any regulated supply chain.

Route availability is not evidence of efficacy, and evidence from one route does not transfer to another. The Registry never provides dosing or sourcing information.

Peptide lifecycle

  1. Discovery

  2. Preclinical

  3. Phase I

  4. Phase II

  5. Phase III

    Furthest established stage

  6. Approved

In clinical development

Sponsor reported TRIUMPH-1 topline on 21 May 2026 and further TRIUMPH and TRANSCEND-T2D findings on 6 June 2026. The wider programme, including TRIUMPH-5 and the TRIUMPH-Outcomes cardiovascular trial, continues. Not approved in any region.

Last documented development: 29 September 2026 — detailed TRIUMPH-2 Phase 3 results presented at EASD and reported by Lilly; programme ongoing

What it is

A single peptide engineered to hit three metabolic receptors, adding glucagon-receptor agonism (which raises energy expenditure) to the incretin pair.

What people claim

  • The largest weight loss yet seen in an incretin-class trial programme
  • Improvements in liver fat
  • Better body composition outcomes

What the evidence actually says

Pivotal Phase 3 efficacy is now supported by detailed TRIUMPH-2 results presented at EASD 2026: in 1,152 adults with obesity or overweight and type 2 diabetes, mean weight change at 80 weeks was -12.7%, -19.1% and -20.8% with 4 mg, 9 mg and 12 mg retatrutide versus -4.0% with placebo under the efficacy estimand. Glycaemic and cardiometabolic markers also improved. Retatrutide remains investigational and unapproved; long-term safety, cardiovascular and renal outcomes, regulatory review and real-world effectiveness remain unresolved.

Useful next reads based on this compound — not recommendations.

Human evidence

  • TRIUMPH-2 Phase 3 (detailed results reported by Lilly and presented at EASD, 29 September 2026): 1,152 adults with obesity or overweight and type 2 diabetes were randomised 1:1:1:1 to retatrutide 4 mg, 9 mg, 12 mg or placebo for 80 weeks. Under the efficacy estimand, mean weight change was -12.7%, -19.1% and -20.8% versus -4.0% with placebo; HbA1c fell by 1.4, 1.6 and 1.5 percentage points versus 0.2 with placebo. At 12 mg, 67.0% achieved at least 15% weight loss, 52.0% at least 20%, and 34.9% at least 25%. These are trial-population averages, not individual forecasts.
  • TRIUMPH-1 Phase 3 topline (sponsor-reported, 21 May 2026): average body-weight reduction of 28.3% over 80 weeks in the 12 mg group, with 45.3% of participants losing at least 30% of body weight.
  • TRIUMPH-1 extension in participants with baseline BMI of 35 or above: average reduction of 30.3% at 104 weeks.
  • TRANSCEND-T2D-1 (sponsor-reported, 6 June 2026): HbA1c reductions of up to 2.0 percentage points and weight loss of up to 16.8% at 40 weeks in type 2 diabetes.
  • Further TRIUMPH findings reported in knee osteoarthritis and obstructive sleep apnoea populations.
  • Earlier randomised Phase 2 trials reporting substantial dose-dependent weight reduction.

Preclinical evidence

  • Rodent models of triple agonism showing increased energy expenditure alongside reduced intake.

Animal and cell findings are Level 1–2 evidence.

Mechanism and pathways

  • Incretin agonism reduces appetite and improves glycaemic handling.
  • Glucagon receptor agonism increases energy expenditure and hepatic fat mobilisation — the piece that distinguishes it from dual agonists.

Safety and unknowns

  • TRIUMPH-2 gastrointestinal adverse events were dose-related: diarrhoea occurred in 27.4%, 33.5% and 33.6% at 4, 9 and 12 mg versus 13.2% placebo; nausea in 13.7%, 20.8% and 28.0% versus 8.0%; vomiting in 5.5%, 10.2% and 15.7% versus 4.2%.
  • Heart-rate increases and glucagon-related metabolic effects require monitoring in trials.
  • TRIUMPH-2 discontinuation due to adverse events was 3.8%, 11.6% and 7.7% at 4, 9 and 12 mg versus 4.9% placebo. Long-term safety is still genuinely incomplete — impressive efficacy numbers do not fill that gap.
  • Separately from the molecule: FDA warning letters dated 24 August 2026 name US vendors selling unapproved injectable products labelled as retatrutide. That is a product-quality and supply-chain risk, not a new molecule-level toxicity finding.

Cancer relevance

This section covers questions raised by how the compound works in the body, plus anything regulators and trial teams keep an eye on. It is not a statement that this compound causes cancer — for most compounds here, no human data exist in either direction.

Monitored in trials; not demonstrated in humans

No demonstrated human cancer signal. Class-level precautionary considerations from incretin pharmacology apply and remain under trial surveillance.

Regulatory status

Regulatory decisions apply to specific jurisdictions, products, formulations and indications. An approval elsewhere is not automatically an approval in your country.

Check the regulatory note and linked primary sources for jurisdiction-specific details.

Not approved in any region. Pivotal Phase 3 results from the TRIUMPH programme were reported in 2026, but positive trial results are not an approval: no regulator has yet licensed it and long-term safety data are still accumulating. Anything sold to the public as 'retatrutide' today is outside approved medical supply. On 24 August 2026 the FDA issued warning letters to US vendors — Royal Peptides LLC, Peptide Partners LLC and TXP Innovations LLC (Tex Peptides) — identifying products marketed as retatrutide as unapproved new drugs, and noting that injectable products sold this way are especially concerning because injection bypasses key body defences. This is regulatory and supply-chain evidence, not evidence that pharmaceutical-grade retatrutide has developed a new toxicity signal. FDA also states explicitly that retatrutide cannot be used in compounding under US federal law, because it is not an FDA-approved drug and is not on a bulk drug substances list permitted for compounding. Again, that is a legal and compounding-status point, not a finding about efficacy or intrinsic toxicity.

  • Baseline · Global

    Investigational only; advanced Phase 3 programme in obesity and metabolic disease.

Key study types

  • L4Good human trialsPhase 2 dose-ranging obesity trial

    Randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging — Adults with obesity

    Dose-dependent weight reduction of a magnitude not previously seen in the class.

Evidence grade

L4Good human trialsHigh confidence in rating

Completed, adequately informative controlled human trials supporting a specified outcome; replication and longer-term safety may remain uncertain.

What would change our rating?

  • Independent peer-reviewed appraisal and additional full pivotal Phase 3 datasets, including longer-term safety and outcome data.
  • A regulatory approval decision in a major region.

References and sources

Source transparency

A provenance snapshot of this profile. Counts show what kinds of sources are cited, not how much scientific weight each source deserves.

Sources fully curated
Last editorial review
2026-09-30
Recently reviewed · 16 days ago
Linked curated sources
10
Sources still pending
0
External specialist reviews
0
None recorded for this profile
Regulatory / label: 4Trial registry: 2Sponsor / official: 4

Review provenance

Registry editorial review: Colin Jackson-White, creator and editor, who is not a doctor or clinician. External specialist review is credited only when a named reviewer has completed a review of this exact profile.

Literature-discovery and AI tools may help locate or challenge candidate evidence, but they are not counted as evidence sources here. Registry judgements are tied to the underlying papers, trial records, regulator documents and official study records.

Source hierarchy: regulatory documents and trial registries first, peer-reviewed work next, sponsor material flagged as non-independent. We never use supplier or clinic marketing as evidence, and where a verified source has not yet been curated we say so rather than inventing one.

Evidence change history

These entries record changes to our assessment of the published evidence — not changes to the compound itself.

  1. Lilly reported that adults with obesity or overweight and type 2 diabetes lost up to a mean 49.6 lb (22.5 kg, 20.8%) and had HbA1c reductions of up to 1.6 percentage points at 80 weeks in TRIUMPH-2.

    Change 1 of 4
    L4Good human trials
    These are company-reported Phase 3 topline results announced on 15 September 2026, pending fuller scientific presentation and publication. Retatrutide remains investigational and unapproved, and another sponsor topline does not move its Level 4 rating. Reviewed 18 September 2026.
  2. Pivotal Phase 3 results now available: TRIUMPH-1 topline (21 May 2026) reported 28.3% average weight loss over 80 weeks in the 12 mg group, with 45.3% of participants losing at least 30% of body weight, and 30.3% average loss at 104 weeks in the higher-BMI extension.

    Change 2 of 4
    L4Good human trials
    Our human-efficacy score rose because the pivotal trial has now reported, but the evidence level and regulatory status did not move. These are sponsor topline announcements rather than peer-reviewed publications, and retatrutide is still not approved anywhere. Strong efficacy evidence and complete long-term safety evidence are different things.
  3. Lilly's 6 June 2026 update reported TRANSCEND-T2D-1 HbA1c reductions of up to 2.0 percentage points and weight loss of up to 16.8% at 40 weeks, plus further TRIUMPH findings in knee osteoarthritis and obstructive sleep apnoea.

    Change 3 of 4
    L4Good human trials
    Added as sponsor-reported trial results across additional populations. Breadth of reported benefit is not the same as regulatory acceptance, and none of these indications is approved.
  4. Baseline entry: efficacy confidence for weight loss set high; safety confidence held low pending Phase 3 completion.

    Change 4 of 4
    L4Good human trialsEvidence rating changedBaseline entry
    Randomised human trial data support large weight reduction. Long-term safety and a regulatory decision are still outstanding, so the two axes are rated separately.

Related claims we’ve checked — in full

Claim verdict

GLP-1s

Partly supportedL4Good human trials

“Retatrutide produces more weight loss than currently approved GLP-1 medicines.”

This verdict applies to the exact claim above. It is not a verdict on the compound overall, a safety guarantee, or a recommendation to use it.

Registry verdict

Partly supported — the trial numbers are striking, but it isn't approved and long-term data are pending.

Why this verdict

  • Randomised mid-stage human trials reported large dose-dependent weight reduction.
  • Cross-trial comparisons are not head-to-head evidence; populations and protocols differ.
  • Efficacy confidence is high; long-term safety confidence is not, because those data don't exist yet.