Neuro & cognitive
Semax
A synthetic heptapeptide derived from an ACTH fragment, registered as nasal drops in Russia and heavily marketed elsewhere as a nootropic.
- How settled this rating is:
- very-low confidence in the current evidence rating
- Routes studied:
- Not established · Nasal, Subcutaneous injection (marketed but never approved)
- Also known as:
- Semax acetate, ACTH(4-7)-PGP heptapeptide
- Last reviewed:
- 2026-08-23
Jump to section
Evidence passport
Semax
A one-screen evidence identity for this compound. These fields describe research maturity, confidence and legal status. They are not a safety guarantee, efficacy percentage or recommendation.
- Evidence level
- L2Animal / lab studies
- Confidence
- Very low confidence in rating
- Regulatory status
- Research / unapproved supply
- Development status
- Unclear
Evidence strength
Higher = more and better-quality human evidence. It does not mean the effect is bigger or that the compound works for you.
Higher = more mature, better-documented human safety data. It does not mean the compound is safer than one with a lower number.
The 0-100 values rate the strength and maturity of evidence, not how effective or safe the compound is.
- Evidence base
- Mostly animal and laboratory research
- Furthest established stage
- Not established
- Human research maturity
- Registered in one national market; limited Western-quality controlled evidence
- Source curation
- Sources fully curated
Routes recorded
Most of this evidence comes from animals and cells
Overview
Higher = more and better-quality human evidence. It does not mean the effect is bigger or that the compound works for you.
Higher = more animal, tissue or cell research. Preclinical results are a starting point, not proof of a human benefit.
Higher = more mature, better-documented human safety data. It does not mean the compound is safer than one with a lower number.
How to read these scores
Every number here rates the evidence, not the compound. They are editorial 0-100 strength ratings, not percentages, and not a rating out of five stars.
- Human efficacy evidence strength — Higher = more and better-quality human evidence. It does not mean the effect is bigger or that the compound works for you.
- Preclinical evidence strength — Higher = more animal, tissue or cell research. Preclinical results are a starting point, not proof of a human benefit.
- Human safety evidence strength — Higher = more mature, better-documented human safety data. It does not mean the compound is safer than one with a lower number. A score of 80 does not mean “80% safe”.
- Evidence level (L0-L5) — the strongest type of study behind the compound, from anecdote (L0) to large replicated human trials (L5). It is a description of the study evidence, not a quality, safety or recommendation rating.
- Confidence — how likely we think it is that this rating changes as new research lands. Low confidence means the picture is unsettled, not that the compound is bad.
None of these ratings is medical advice, a safety guarantee, or a recommendation to use anything. How we grade evidence.
How far human research has progressed: Registered in one national market; limited Western-quality controlled evidence
Routes & formulations
Marketed / research routes — never approved
The Russian registration is for a nasal-drop formulation. Intranasal and injectable products sold in the US research market are unapproved; a route being marketed is not evidence it works or is safe.
Route availability is not evidence of efficacy, and evidence from one route does not transfer to another. The Registry never provides dosing or sourcing information.
Peptide lifecycle
Discovery
Preclinical
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Approved
Registered as a medicine in Russia; no established development programme in FDA/EMA-regulated regions.
What it is
A seven-amino-acid peptide derived from a fragment of ACTH, developed in Russia and promoted internationally for cognition, focus and recovery from neurological injury.
What people claim
- Improves memory, focus and mental performance
- Speeds recovery after stroke
- Helps anxiety and migraine
What the evidence actually says
The published human literature is concentrated in one research ecosystem and does not meet the standard of adequately powered, independently replicated controlled trials. Semax is not established as effective for cognition, stroke recovery, migraine or anxiety in general populations, however confidently it is marketed.
Related evidence
Useful next reads based on this compound — not recommendations.
- Related compound
Selank evidence profile
A synthetic heptapeptide related to tuftsin, marketed online for anxiety despite no regulatory approval and almost no independent human evidence.
- Compare
Compare Semax vs Selank evidence
Same questions, same fields, side by side — including how much human evidence exists.
- Checked claim
Claim review: “Semax is FDA-approved as a nootropic nasal spray.”
Our verdict on this exact wording, with the reasoning behind it.
- Context
Research Desk
How to read animal, early-phase and controlled human studies without over-reading them.
Human evidence
- Russian clinical literature exists but is largely inaccessible to independent Western appraisal and lacks the trial quality required here.
- No adequately powered, independently replicated randomised controlled trials in major indexed journals support the nootropic claims.
Preclinical evidence
- Rodent studies reporting effects on neurotrophin expression and stress responses.
Animal and cell findings are Level 1–2 evidence.
Mechanism and pathways
- Proposed effects on BDNF and other neurotrophic signalling.
- Structural relationship to ACTH(4-7) fragments, which have melanocortin-system activity in animal models.
Safety and unknowns
- FDA has identified significant safety risks for compounding, and a formal advisory review took place at the July 2026 PCAC meeting. An advisory review is not an approval and not a finding of efficacy.
- No systematic, regulator-reviewed human safety dataset exists for the products actually sold outside Russia.
- Unapproved supply chains carry documented purity, sterility and mislabelling risks.
Cancer relevance
This section covers questions raised by how the compound works in the body, plus anything regulators and trial teams keep an eye on. It is not a statement that this compound causes cancer — for most compounds here, no human data exist in either direction.
No established human signal
Regulatory status
Regulatory decisions apply to specific jurisdictions, products, formulations and indications. An approval elsewhere is not automatically an approval in your country.
Check the regulatory note and linked primary sources for jurisdiction-specific details.
Not approved by the FDA or other major Western regulators. FDA material notes Semax is registered in Russia as nasal drops, while intranasal and injectable products marketed in the US are not FDA-approved. FDA has identified it as a bulk substance presenting significant safety risks for compounding — a compounding safety classification, not an 'FDA ban' — and it was covered by FDA's Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee meeting on 23-24 July 2026.
Evidence grade
Documented compound-specific animal or laboratory outcome findings, without qualifying human evidence for the assessed benefit.
What would change our rating?
- Adequately powered, independently conducted randomised controlled trials with pre-registered endpoints.
- A published regulator-grade human safety dataset.
References and sources
Source transparency
A provenance snapshot of this profile. Counts show what kinds of sources are cited, not how much scientific weight each source deserves.
- Last editorial review
- 2026-08-23
- Recently reviewed · 54 days ago
- Linked curated sources
- 3
- Sources still pending
- 0
- External specialist reviews
- 0
- None recorded for this profile
Review provenance
Registry editorial review: Colin Jackson-White, creator and editor, who is not a doctor or clinician. External specialist review is credited only when a named reviewer has completed a review of this exact profile.
Literature-discovery and AI tools may help locate or challenge candidate evidence, but they are not counted as evidence sources here. Registry judgements are tied to the underlying papers, trial records, regulator documents and official study records.
- Regulatory / labelFDA — Certain bulk drug substances for use in compounding that may present significant safety risks
- Regulatory / labelFDA — July 23-24, 2026 meeting of the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee
- Regulatory / labelFDA — Semax acetate briefing material (PCAC 2026)
Source hierarchy: regulatory documents and trial registries first, peer-reviewed work next, sponsor material flagged as non-independent. We never use supplier or clinic marketing as evidence, and where a verified source has not yet been curated we say so rather than inventing one.
Evidence change history
These entries record changes to our assessment of the published evidence — not changes to the compound itself.
- Change 1 of 1L1Theory onlyBaseline entryThis reflects curation of existing regulatory documents, not new clinical findings. FDA 2026 PCAC review material established, for example, that no clinical studies or human exposure data were identified for KPV via any route — a fact that sets the ceiling for every marketed claim about it.
Related claims we’ve checked — in full
Claim verdict
Neuro & cognitive
“Semax is FDA-approved as a nootropic nasal spray.”
This verdict applies to the exact claim above. It is not a verdict on the compound overall, a safety guarantee, or a recommendation to use it.
Registry verdict
Misleading — it is not FDA-approved at all.
Why this verdict
- FDA material notes Semax is registered in Russia as nasal drops; that is a foreign national registration, not FDA approval.
- Intranasal and injectable Semax products marketed in the US are unapproved, and the FDA placed Semax on its 503A Category 2 list of substances presenting significant safety risks for compounding.
- Category 2 means identified significant safety risk for compounding — not that 'the FDA banned it', and not approval either.